Abused, Misused, and Memed: Charlotte Temple in a Modern Media Landscape
The purpose of the article is to use memes to explain and create an understanding for complicated topics that are present in Charlotte Temple (1794). The memes discussed within the article give the readers a different way to interact and understand classic literature. They address difficult topics, like the consent issues apparent in Charlotte Temple, in a way that is approachable. Memes are an innovative way to interact with and understand literature. Different layers of meaning and context can be achieved or applied to a text by the use of memes. Also, the memes provide a format to interact with tropes within Charlotte Temple. Descriptions of Charlotte Temple, an explanation of the memes used, and an explication of how the meme’s work within the context of the novel are provided. Individual efforts made to create the memes come from the text Charlotte Temple, cited documents, and personal knowledge about memes. The memes are used to tackle difficult subjects with humor. These topics include: romantic coercion, kidnapping, lack of parenting, and consent. Each meme deals with the topics differently, and some issues overlap with the memes. For instance, The Persian Cat Room Guardian meme focuses on the absence of parental guidance and the repercussions For Charlotte. Romantic coercion, consent, and kidnapping are part of each meme, and discussed within the paper.
Key Words: meme, Charlotte Temple, seduction, social media, eighteenth century.
Authors submitting a paper to the Journal of Creative Inquiry automatically agree to confer a limited license to the Journal of Creative Inquiry if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. This license allows the Journal of Creative Inquiry to publish a manuscript in a given issue. Authors have a choice of:
1. Dedicating the article to the public domain. This allows anyone to make any use of the article at any time, including commercial use. A good way to do this is to use the Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication Web form; see http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain-2?lang=en.
2. Retaining some rights while allowing some use. For example, authors may decide to disallow commercial use without permission. Authors may also decide whether to allow users to make modifications (e.g. translations, adaptations) without permission.
3. Retaining full rights, including translation and reproduction rights. Authors may use the statement: © Author 2016 All Rights Reserved. Authors may choose to use their own wording to reserve copyright. If you choose to retain full copyright, please add your copyright statement to the end of the article. Authors submitting a paper to the Journal of Creative Inquiry do so in the understanding that Internet publishing is both an opportunity and challenge. In this environment, authors and publishers do not always have the means to protect against unauthorized copying or editing of copyright–protected works.